TALABALARNING BILISH FAOLLIGINI OSHIRISHNING PEDAGOGIK MEXANIZMLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22545546Аннотация
Mazkur maqolada oliy ta’lim muassasalarida iqtisodiy fanlarni o‘qitish jarayonida talabalarning bilish
faolligini (kognitiv faoliyatini) oshirishning pedagogik mexanizmlari nazariy va empirik jihatdan tadqiq etilgan. Muallif
tomonidan bilish faolligini oshirishga xizmat qiluvchi o‘zaro bog‘liq uchta mexanizm - motivatsion-rag‘batlantiruvchi, faollashtiruvchi-
texnologik hamda refleksiv-baholovchi mexanizmlarga asoslangan tarkibiy model ishlab chiqilgan. 130 nafar
talaba ishtirokida o‘tkazilgan pedagogik eksperiment natijalari taklif etilgan pedagogik mexanizmlar majmuini amaliyotga
tatbiq etish natijasida eksperiment guruhida yuqori darajadagi bilish faolligiga ega talabalar ulushi 16,2 foizdan
38,5 foizgacha oshganligini ko‘rsatdi. Olingan natijalar bo‘yicha aniqlangan farqlar statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli ekanligi
qayd etildi (p < 0,05). Tadqiqot natijalari oliy ta’lim muassasalarida iqtisodiy fanlarni o‘qitish metodikasini takomillashtirish,
talabalarning bilish faolligini rivojlantirish hamda iqtisodiy yo‘nalishdagi o‘quv kurslarini pedagogik jihatdan samarali loyihalashda
amaliy ahamiyat kasb etadi.
Ключевые слова
bilish faolligi, kognitiv faoliyat, pedagogik mexanizm, iqtisodiy ta’lim, ta’lim motivatsiyasi, interaktiv metodlar, muammoli ta’lim, keys-stadi, refleksiya, oliy ta’lim.Библиографические ссылки
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 8-oktabrdagi PF-5847-son “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy taʼlim
tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi Farmoni. - Toshkent, 2019.
2. Щукина Г.И. Активизация познавательной деятельности учащихся в учебном процессе. - М.: Просвещение,
1979. - 160 с.
3. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, 1978. - 159 p.
4. Талызина Н.Ф. Управление процессом усвоения знаний. - М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1984. - 344 с.
5. Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research // Journal of Engineering Education. - 2004. - Vol.
93, No. 3. - P. 223–231.
6. Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,
and mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. - 2014. - Vol. 111, No. 23. - P. 8410–8415.
7. Chi M.T.H., Wylie R. The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes // Educational
Psychologist. - 2014. - Vol. 49, No. 4. - P. 219–243.
8. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior
// Psychological Inquiry. - 2000. - Vol. 11, No. 4. - P. 227–268.
9. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive
Domain. - New York: Longmans, Green, 1956. - 207 p.
10. Schunk D.H., Zimmerman B.J. Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. - New
York: Routledge, 2008. - 433 p.
11. Prince M., Felder R. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases //
Journal of Engineering Education. - 2006. - Vol. 95, No. 2. - P. 123–138.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 «Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi» jurnali
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Страницы
Цитирование