Bo‘lajak tibbiyot xodimlarining diagnostik kompetensiyalarini shakllantirishda innovatsion ta’lim texnologiyalarining o‘rni: ilmiy adabiyotlar sharhi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21837764Ключевые слова:
diagnostik kompetensiya, innovatsion ta’lim, klinik fikrlash, simulyatsiya, virtual bemor, sun’iy intellekt, gamifikatsiya, tibbiy ta’lim.Аннотация
Maqolada bo‘lajak tibbiyot xodimlarining diagnostik kompetensiyalarini shakllantirishda innovatsion ta’lim
texnologiyalarining o‘rni tahlil qilingan. Muammoli ta’lim, klinik keyslar, simulyatsiya, virtual bemorlar, VR/AR, gamifikatsiya,
raqamli platformalar va sun’iy intellektning klinik fikrlash, differensial tashxis hamda diagnostik qaror qabul qilishga
ta’siri yoritilgan. Ilmiy manbalar tahlili ushbu texnologiyalar talabalarning amaliy ko‘nikmalari, mustaqil fikrlashi va kasbiy
ishonchini rivojlantirishini ko‘rsatdi. Ularning samaradorligi klinik ssenariylar sifati, qayta aloqa va an’anaviy ta’lim bilan
uyg‘unlashtirilishiga bog‘liq
Библиографические ссылки
1. Eva K.W. What Every Teacher Needs to Know About Clinical Reasoning // Medical Education. – Oxford, United
Kingdom: Wiley, 2005. – Vol. 39, No. 1. – P. 98–106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x.
2. Norman G. Research in Clinical Reasoning: Past History and Current Trends // Medical Education. – Oxford, United
Kingdom: Wiley, 2005. – Vol. 39, No. 4. – P. 418–427. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02127.x.
3. Bowen J.L. Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning // The New England Journal of Medicine.
– Boston, USA: Massachusetts Medical Society, 2006. – Vol. 355, No. 21. – P. 2217–2225. DOI: 10.1056/
NEJMra054782.
4. Schmidt H.G., Mamede S. How to Improve the Teaching of Clinical Reasoning: A Narrative Review and a Proposal //
Medical Education. – Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley, 2015. – Vol. 49, No. 10. – P. 961–973. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12775.
5. Daniel M., Rencic J., Durning S.J., Holmboe E., Santen S.A., Lang V. et al. Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods:
A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance // Academic Medicine. – Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer, 2019. – Vol.
94, No. 6. – P. 902–912. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.
6. Xu H., Ang B.W.G., Soh J.Y., Ponnamperuma G.G. Methods to Improve Diagnostic Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical
Education in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review // Journal of General Internal Medicine. – New York, USA:
Springer, 2021. – Vol. 36, No. 9. – P. 2745–2754. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06916-0.
7. Cooper N., Bartlett M., Gay S., Hammond A., Lillicrap M., Matthan J., Singh M. Consensus Statement on the Content
of Clinical Reasoning Curricula in Undergraduate Medical Education // Medical Teacher. – London, United Kingdom:
Taylor & Francis, 2021. – Vol. 43, No. 2. – P. 152–159. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343.
8. Thistlethwaite J.E., Davies D., Ekeocha S., Kidd J.M., MacDougall C., Matthews P. et al. The Effectiveness of
Case-Based Learning in Health Professional Education: A BEME Systematic Review. BEME Guide No. 23 //
Medical Teacher. – London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2012. – Vol. 34, No. 6. – P. e421–e444. DOI:
10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.
9. Manuaba I.B.A.P., No Y., Wu C.C. The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Improving Critical Thinking, Problem-
Solving and Self-Directed Learning in First-Year Medical Students: A Meta-Analysis // PLOS ONE. – San Francisco,
USA: Public Library of Science, 2022. – Vol. 17, No. 11. – Article e0277339. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277339.
10. Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R., Gordon D.L., Scalese R.J. Features and Uses of High-Fidelity Medical
Simulations That Lead to Effective Learning: A BEME Systematic Review // Medical Teacher. – London, United
Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2005. – Vol. 27, No. 1. – P. 10–28. DOI: 10.1080/01421590500046924.
11. Cook D.A., Hatala R., Brydges R., Zendejas B., Szostek J.H., Wang A.T. et al. Technology-Enhanced Simulation for
Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // JAMA. – Chicago, USA: American Medical
Association, 2011. – Vol. 306, No. 9. – P. 978–988. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234.
12. Cant R.P., Cooper S.J. Simulation-Based Learning in Nurse Education: Systematic Review // Journal of Advanced
Nursing. – Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley, 2010. – Vol. 66, No. 1. – P. 3–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x.
13. Theobald K.A., Tutticci N., Ramsbotham J., Johnston S. Effectiveness of Using Simulation in the Development of Clinical
Reasoning in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Systematic Review // Nurse Education in Practice. – Amsterdam,
Netherlands: Elsevier, 2021. – Vol. 57. – Article 103220. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103220.
14. Padilha J.M., Machado P.P., Ribeiro A., Ramos J., Costa P. Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized
Controlled Trial // Journal of Medical Internet Research. – Toronto, Canada: JMIR Publications, 2019. – Vol. 21,
No. 3. – Article e11529. DOI: 10.2196/11529.
15. Cook D.A., Erwin P.J., Triola M.M. Computerized Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education: A Systematic
Review and Meta-Analysis // Academic Medicine. – Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer, 2010. – Vol. 85, No. 10. – P.
1589–1602. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13.
16. Sim J.J.M., Rusli K.D.B., Seah B., Levett-Jones T., Lau Y., Liaw S.Y. Virtual Simulation to Enhance Clinical Reasoning
in Nursing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Clinical Simulation in Nursing. – Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier,
2022. – Vol. 69. – P. 26–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2022.05.006.
17. Barsom E.Z., Graafland M., Schijven M.P. Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Applications
in Medical Training // Surgical Endoscopy. – New York, USA: Springer, 2016. – Vol. 30, No. 10. – P. 4174–4183. DOI:
10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6.
18. Gentry S.V., Gauthier A., L’Estrade Ehrstrom B., Wortley D., Lilienthal A., Tudor Car L. et al. Serious Gaming and
Gamification Education in Health Professions: Systematic Review // Journal of Medical Internet Research. – Toronto,
Canada: JMIR Publications, 2019. – Vol. 21, No. 3. – Article e12994. DOI: 10.2196/12994.
19. Chan K.S., Zary N. Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative
Review // JMIR Medical Education. – Toronto, Canada: JMIR Publications, 2019. – Vol. 5, No. 1. – Article e13930.
DOI: 10.2196/13930.
20. Gordon M., Daniel M., Ajiboye A., Uraiby H., Xu N.Y., Bartlett R. et al. A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence in
Medical Education: BEME Guide No. 84 // Medical Teacher. – London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2024. – Vol.
46, No. 4. – P. 446–470. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2314198.
21. Tolentino R., Zuniga C., Kearns L., Chatterjee A., Kwon Y. Curriculum Frameworks and Educational Programs in Artificial
Intelligence for Medical Students, Residents and Practicing Physicians: A Scoping Review // BMC Medical Education.
– London, United Kingdom: BioMed Central, 2024. – Vol. 24. – Article 759. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05704-8.
22. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D. et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement:
An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews // BMJ. – London, United Kingdom: BMJ Publishing Group,
2021. – Vol. 372. – Article n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
