Bo‘lajak tibbiyot xodimlarining diagnostik kompetensiyalarini rivojlantirishning nazariy asoslari va zamonaviy tendensiyalari: ilmiy adabiyotlar tahlili
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21526832Ключевые слова:
diagnostik kompetensiya, bo‘lajak tibbiyot xodimlari, kompetensiyaga asoslangan ta’lim, klinik fikrlash, diagnostik mulohaza, fanlararo integratsiya, simulyatsion ta’lim, raqamli texnologiyalar, tibbiy ta’lim.Аннотация
Mazkur maqolada bo‘lajak tibbiyot xodimlarining diagnostik kompetensiyalarini rivojlantirishning nazariy
asoslari va zamonaviy tendensiyalariga oid xalqaro ilmiy tadqiqotlar tahlil qilindi. Diagnostik kompetensiyaning mazmuni,
tarkibiy komponentlari va uni shakllantirishning pedagogik yondashuvlari yoritildi. Klinik fikrlash, diagnostik mulohaza
yuritish, fanlararo integratsiya, muammoga asoslangan ta’lim, klinik holatlar tahlili, simulyatsion va raqamli ta’lim texnologiyalarining
ahamiyati baholandi. Shuningdek, OSCE, Mini-CEX, SCT va WPBA kabi baholash usullarining imkoniyatlari
ko‘rib chiqildi. Tahlil natijalari kompetensiyaga yo‘naltirilgan ta’lim, fanlararo integratsiya va raqamli texnologiyalarning
samaradorligini ko‘rsatdi. Shu bilan birga, ushbu yo‘nalishdagi metodikalarning uzoq muddatli samaradorligi
hamda O‘zbekiston tibbiy ta’limi sharoitida olib borilgan tadqiqotlar yetarli emasligi aniqlandi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. World Federation for Medical Education. WFME Standards for Basic Medical Education 2020. - Copenhagen: World
Federation for Medical Education, 2020. - 36 p.
2. Frank J.R., Snell L.S., Cate O.T., Holmboe E.S., Carraccio C., Swing S.R., Harris P., Glasgow N.J., Campbell C., Dath
D. et al. Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice // Medical Teacher. - 2010. - Vol. 32, No. 8. - P. 638-
645. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.
3. Harden R.M. Outcome-based education: The future is today // Medical Teacher. - 2007. - Vol. 29, No. 7. - P. 625–629.
DOI: 10.1080/01421590701729930.
4. Gruppen L.D., Mangrulkar R.S., Kolars J.C. The promise of competency-based education in the health professions for
improving global health // Human Resources for Health. - 2012. - Vol. 10. - Article 43. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-10-43.
5. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Barsuk J.H., Wayne D.B. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with
translational outcomes // Medical Education. - 2014. - Vol. 48, No. 4. - P. 375-385. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12391.
6. Hejri S.M., Jalili M., Masoomi R., Shirazi M., Nedjat S., Norcini J. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in
undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59 // Medical Teacher. – 2020.
- Vol. 42, No. 2. - P. 125-142. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652732.
7. Van der Vleuten C.P.M., Schuwirth L.W.T., Driessen E.W., Govaerts M.J.B., Heeneman S. Twelve tips for programmatic
assessment // Medical Teacher. - 2015. - Vol. 37, No. 7. - P. 641–646. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388.
8. Eva K.W. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning // Medical Education. – 2005. – Vol. 39, No. 1. –
P. 98–106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x.
9. Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends // Medical Education. - 2005. - Vol. 39, No.
4. - P. 418-427. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02127.x.
10. Thistlethwaite J.E., Davies D., Ekeocha S., Kidd J.M., MacDougall C., Matthews P., Purkis J., Clay D. The effectiveness
of case-based learning in health professional education: A BEME systematic review // Medical Teacher. - 2012.
- Vol. 34, No. 6. - P. e421–e444. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.
11. Burgess A., van Diggele C., Roberts C., Mellis C. Team-based learning: Design, facilitation and participation // BMC
Medical Education. - 2020. - Vol. 20 (Suppl. 2). - Article 461. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.
12. Plackett R., Kassianos A.P., Mylan S., Kambouri M., Raine R., Sheringham J. The effectiveness of using virtual patient
educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: A systematic review // BMC Medical Education.
- 2022. - Vol. 22. - Article 365. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03410-x.
13. Jay R., Sanders J., Patel R., Leonardi-Bee J., Ackbarally Y., O’Hanlon M., Bandyopadhyay S., Faraj D., Brown J.,
Wilson E. The Use of Virtual Patients to Provide Feedback on Clinical Reasoning: A Systematic Review // Academic
Medicine. - 2025. - Vol. 100, No. 2. - P. 229-238. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005908.
14. Gonullu I., Bayazit A., Erden S. Exploring medical students’ perceptions of individual and group-based clinical reasoning
with virtual patients: A qualitative study // BMC Medical Education. - 2024. - Vol. 24. - Article 189. DOI: 10.1186/
s12909-024-05121-x.
15. Kassianos A.P., Plackett R., Kambouri M.A., et al. Educators’ perspectives of adopting virtual patient online learning
tools to teach clinical reasoning in medical schools: A qualitative study // BMC Medical Education. – 2023. - Vol. 23. -
Article 424. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04422-x.
16. García-Torres D., Vicente Ripoll M.A., Fernández Peris C., Mira Solves J.J. Enhancing Clinical Reasoning with Virtual
Patients: A Hybrid Systematic Review Combining Human Reviewers and ChatGPT // Healthcare. - 2024. - Vol. 12, No.
22. - Article 2241. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12222241.
17. Woolf K., et al. Assessment in Undergraduate Competency-Based Medical Education: A Systematic Review // Cureus.
- 2024. - Vol. 16. - e60781.
18. World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. - Geneva: WHO, 2016.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
