The Convergence of Educational Paradigms: Policy Borrowing, Adaptability, and Institutional Reform in Uzbekistan’s Modern School System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20697500Ключевые слова:
educational policy borrowing, educational reform, human capital, indigenization, Uzbekistan, comparative education, Chinese educational paradigm, Finnish education system, structured autonomy, strategic syncretismАннотация
The present paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of educational policy borrowing, institutional adaptation,
and reform in the modern school system of Uzbekistan within the context of 21st-century global paradigms. It
explores a three-way axis of educational systems: the East Asian meritocratic and digitalized educational system (China),
the Western humanistic educational system focused on student well-being (Finland), and the rapidly developing economy
of Uzbekistan, which serves as both an ideological and geographical bridge. The study is based on the stages of attraction,
decision, implementation, and indigenization of foreign frameworks into the local context, as outlined in the structural
model of policy borrowing developed by Phillips and Ochs. Special attention is given to the systemic risks of uncritical
policy transfer, such as student burnout (the Chinese phenomenon of “involution”) and administrative challenges resulting
from premature decentralization (the Finnish model). The paper proposes a pathway of “structured autonomy” and strategic
syncretism, combining the strong accountability mechanisms of the East with the flexibility of the West in human
resource management to support the sustainable development of national human capital
Библиографические ссылки
1. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National
Bureau of Economic Research.
2. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College
Press.3. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory models. Comparative
Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006032000162020
4. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education.
British Educational Research Journal.
5. Central Committee of the Communist Party of China & State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2021).
Guanyu jinyibu jianqing yiwu jiaoyu jieduan xuesheng zuoye fudan he xiaowai peixun fudan de yijian [Opinions on further
reducing the burden of homework and off-campus training for students in compulsory education]. General Office
of the CPC Central Committee.
6. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Farmoni: 2022–2026-yillarda maktab ta’limini rivojlantirish bo‘yicha milliy dasturni
tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida [Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan: On approval of the National Program
for the Development of School Education for 2022–2026]
7. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi xalq ta’limi tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida [On
approval of the Concept for the Development of the Public Education System of the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030]
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.