Bo‘lajak muhandislarni kasbiy tayyorgarligini grafik ma’lumotlar asosida oshirishning didaktik asoslari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15814354Ключевые слова:
bo‘lajak muhandislar, kasbiy tayyorgarlik, grafik ma’lumotlar, didaktik yondashuv, vizual ta’lim, interaktiv texnologiyalar, pedagogik metodologiya, ta’lim samaradorligi, 3D modellashtirish, muhandislik ta’limiАннотация
Ushbu maqolada bo‘lajak muhandislarning kasbiy tayyorgarligini oshirishda grafik ma’lumotlardan samarali
foydalanishning metodologik asoslari yoritilgan. Tadqiqotning asosiy maqsadi – grafik axborot vositalari orqali talabalarning
kasbiy kompetensiyalarini shakllantirish, ularda fazoviy tafakkur, texnik tahlil va muammoli vaziyatlarda yechim
topish ko‘nikmalarini rivojlantirishdan iborat. Tadqiqot doirasida ikki guruhga bo‘lingan talabalar (eksperimental va nazorat
guruhlari) bilan tajriba-sinov ishlari olib borildi. Eksperimental guruhga grafik vositalar (3D modellar, CAD chizmalar, texnologik
jarayon diagrammalari, simulyatorlar) asosida darslar tashkil etildi, nazorat guruhida esa an’anaviy metodlardan
foydalanildi. Natijalar SPSS dasturi yordamida statistik tahlil qilindi va grafik vositalar asosida o‘qitish yuqori samaradorlikka
ega ekanligi aniqlandi. Jumladan, eksperimental guruh talabalari o‘zlashtirish darajasi, tahliliy fikrlash va kasbiy
muammolarni hal qilish ko‘nikmalarida sezilarli natijalarga erishganliklari kuzatildi. Tadqiqot yakunida grafik ma’lumotlardan
foydalanish asosida ishlab chiqilgan metodik tavsiyalar taqdim etildi. Mazkur ish muhandislik ta’limini modernizatsiyalash
va uni amaliyotga yaqinlashtirishga xizmat qiladi.
Библиографические ссылки
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning
and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2010). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating
visuals in training materials. Pfeiffer.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36. https://doi.
org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rieber, L. P. (1990). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 82(1), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.135
Shank, P. (2005). The online learning idea book: 95 proven ways to enhance technology-based and blended learning.
Pfeiffer.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer
Studies, 57(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
Shodmonov, S. (2022). Didaktik texnologiyalar va interaktiv metodlar. Toshkent: TDPU nashriyoti.
Qodirov, R., & Rahimova, M. (2021). Muhandislik ta’limida zamonaviy axborot texnologiyalari. Oliy ta’lim muammolari,
(4), 65–71.
Axmedov, I. (2020). Muhandislik grafikasi o‘qitish metodikasi. Ta’limda innovatsiyalar jurnali, 2(3), 12–18.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
