MAKTAB O‘QUVCHILARIDA KREATIV KOMPETENTLIKNI NEYROPEDAGOGIK TEXNOLOGIYALAR YORDAMIDA SHAKLLANTIRISHNING NAZARIY-METODIK ASOSLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22831089Аннотация
Maqolada maktab o‘quvchilarida kreativ kompetentlikni neyropedagogik texnologiyalar yordamida shakllantirishning nazariy-metodik asoslari konseptual tahlil qilinadi. Kreativlik, kreativ fikrlash va kreativ kompetentlik tushunchalari chegaralanib, kreativ kompetentlik motivatsion-qadriyatli, kognitiv, operatsion-faoliyatli, kommunikativ va refleksiv-baholash komponentlarining integrativ birligi sifatida asoslanadi. Neyropedagogik texnologiya diqqat, ishchi xotira, ijro funksiyalari, kognitiv moslashuvchanlik, emotsiya, motivatsiya, metakognitsiya va tajribaga bog‘liq neyroplastiklik haqidagi ishonchli dalillarni pedagogik dizayn bilan ehtiyotkor integratsiyalovchi yondashuv sifatida operatsion ta’riflanadi. Nazariy-konseptual sintez asosida muammoli va loyiha asosida ta’lim, STEAM, dizayn fikrlash, g‘oya generatsiyasi, konseptual xaritalash, gamifikatsiya va refleksiv baholashning kreativ kompetentlik komponentlari bilan funksional aloqalari tizimlashtiriladi. Natijada diagnostik, motivatsion, rivojlantiruvchi-faoliyatli va refleksiv-baholash bosqichlaridan iborat mualliflik nazariy-metodik modeli taklif etiladi. Modelning yangiligi kreativ kompetentlik komponentlari, psixologik-neyrokognitiv tayanchlar, pedagogik sharoitlar va metodik vositalarni yagona nazariy-funksional tizimda birlashtirish bilan belgilanadi.
Ключевые слова
нейропедагогика, креативная компетентность, креативное мышление, исполнительные функции, метакогниция, нейропластичность, STEAM, дизайн-мышлениеБиблиографические ссылки
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24.
– P. 92–96. – DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004
· Beaty R.E., Kenett Y.N., Christensen A.P., Rosenberg M.D., Benedek M., Chen Q., Fink A., Qiu J., Kwapil T.R., Kane M.J., Silvia P.J. Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. (2018). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(5), 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713532115
· Chen Q., Kenett Y.N., Cui Z., Takeuchi H., Fink A., Benedek M., Zeitlen D.C., Zhuang K., Lloyd-Cox J., Kawashima R., Qiu J., Beaty R.E. Dynamic switching between brain networks predicts creative ability. (2025). Communications Biology, 8, 42003–025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-07470-9
· Diamond A. Executive Functions. (2013). Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/
· Immordino-Yang M.H., Damasio A. We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education. (2007). Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-
· Fischer C., Malycha C.P., Schafmann E. The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. (2019). Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137
· Cheng L., Wang M., Chen Y., Niu W., Hong M., Zhu Y. Design My Music Instrument: A Project-Based Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics Program on The Development of Creativity. (2022). Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763948
· Kwon H., Lee Y. A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity. (2025). STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025014
· Muneer S., Santhosh M., Parangusan H., Bhadra J. A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education. (2026). International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 36, 919–949.
· He X., Xiong H., Peng K. et al. How does design thinking promote STEM learning? Meta-analysis of learning outcomes and moderating effects. (2026). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13.
· Cherrier S., Le Roux P.-Y., Gerard F.-M., Wattelez G., Galy O. Impact of a neuroscience intervention (NeuroStratE) on the school performance of high school students: Academic achievement, self-knowledge and autonomy through a metacognitive approach. (2020). Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100125
· Ansari D., De Smedt B., Grabner R.H. Neuroeducation – a critical overview of an emerging field. (2012). Neuroethics, 5, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3
· Guilford J.P. Creativity. (1950). American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
· OECD. New PISA results on creative thinking: Can students think outside the box?. (2024). PISA in Focus.
Pradeep, K. (2024). Sulur Anbalagan R., Thangavelu A.P., Aswathy S., Jisha V.G., Vaisakhi V.S. Neuroeducation: understanding neural dynamics in learning and teaching. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1437418
Shvarts-Serebro, I., Ben-Yehudah, G., Elgavi-Hershler, O., Grobgeld, E., Katzof, A., Luzzatto, E., Shalom, M., & Zohar-Harel, T. (2024). Agents of change: integration of neuropedagogy in pre-service teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1369394
Pasarín-Lavín, T., Abín, A., García, T., & Rodríguez, C. (2023). Relationship between Executive Functions and Creativity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Children, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/
Woo, J., & Lee, S. (2024). -Y. The moderating effect of creative metacognition on adolescents’ risk-taking in creative performance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09927-8
Williamson, B., Pykett, J., & Kotouza, D. (2026). Learning brains: educational neuroscience, neurotechnology and neuropedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 34(2), 515–535.
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/427311a
Anastasiou, D., Wirngo, C. N., & Bagos, P. (2024). The Effectiveness of Concept Maps on Students’ Achievement in Science: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 10648–024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09877-y
Li, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Gamification enhances student intrinsic motivation, perceptions of autonomy and relatedness, but minimal impact on competency: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10337-7
Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity?. Journal of Creativity, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072
Kim, K. H. (2008). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
Yüzüak, A. V., & Recepkethüda, R. (2026). The effect of SCAMPER activities on 7th grade students’ creative thinking, science achievement and perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 44(3), 1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2575910
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Beaty, R. E., Johnson, D. R., Zeitlen, D. C., & Forthmann, B. (2022). Semantic Distance and the Alternate Uses Task: Recommendations for Reliable Automated Assessment of Originality. Creativity Research Journal, 34(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2025720
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 «Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi» jurnali
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Страницы
Цитирование