Individual ta’lim sharoitida talabalarni kasbiy faoliyatga tayyorlash samaradorligini pedagogik tajriba-sinov va matematik-statistik tahlil asosida baholash

Авторы

  • Gulbaxor Gaynazarova Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21962884

Ключевые слова:

individual ta’lim, kasbiy faoliyatga tayyorlash, didaktik tizim, pedagogik tajriba-sinov, kasbiy tayyorgarlik, motivatsion-qadriyatli mezon, kognitiv-operatsion mezon, faoliyat-amaliy mezon, refleksiv-metakognitiv mezon, integrallashgan natijalar, Pirson χ² mezoni, matematik-statistik tahlil, bo‘lajak pedagoglar

Аннотация

Mazkur maqolada individual ta’lim sharoitida talabalarni kasbiy faoliyatga tayyorlashga yo‘naltirilgan didaktik
tizim samaradorligini aniqlashga qaratilgan pedagogik tajriba-sinov ishlarining mazmuni va natijalari yoritilgan. Talabalarning
kasbiy faoliyatga tayyorlik darajasi motivatsion-qadriyatli, kognitiv-operatsion, faoliyat-amaliy hamda refleksiv-metakognitiv
mezonlar asosida kompleks baholangan. Tajriba-sinov ishlari aniqlashtiruvchi, shakllantiruvchi va yakuniy
bosqichlarda amalga oshirilib, tajriba va nazorat guruhlari natijalari qiyosiy tahlil qilingan. Yakuniy natijalar tajriba guruhida
kasbiy tayyorgarlik darajasining sezilarli oshganligini ko‘rsatgan. Natijalarning statistik ishonchliligi Pirsonning χ² mezoni
asosida tekshirilib, χ² hisoblangan = 15,25, χ² kritik = 5,991 ekanligi aniqlandi. χ² hisoblangan > χ² kritik bo‘lishi tajriba
va nazorat guruhlari o‘rtasidagi farqning statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli ekanligini hamda individual ta’lim asosida ishlab
chiqilgan didaktik tizim samaradorligini tasdiqladi.

Биография автора

  • Gulbaxor Gaynazarova

    Mustaqil tadqiqotchi, p. f. f. d., (PhD), dotsent

Библиографические ссылки

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini

tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi PF-5847-son Farmoni. 08.10.2019. https://lex.uz/ru/doc-passport/-4545884

2. UNESCO. Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable

Development Goal 4. – Paris: UNESCO, 2016.

3. Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. – Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice-Hall, 1984. – 256 p.

4. Zimmerman B. J. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview // Theory Into Practice. – 2002. – Vol. 41. – No.

2. – P. 64–70. DOI: 10.1207/S15430421TIP4102_2.

5. Pintrich P. R., De Groot E. V. Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance

// Journal of Educational Psychology. – 1990. – Vol. 82. – No. 1. – P. 33–40. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.

6. Pintrich P. R. The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning // Handbook of Self-Regulation / Eds. M. Boekaerts,

P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner. – San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. – P. 451–502. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012109890-

2/50043-3.

7. Puustinen M., Pulkkinen L. Models of Self-Regulated Learning: A Review // Scandinavian Journal of Educational

Research. – 2001. – Vol. 45. – No. 3. – P. 269–286. DOI: 10.1080/00313830120074206.

8. Winne P. H., Perry N. E. Measuring Self-Regulated Learning // Handbook of Self-Regulation / Eds. M. Boekaerts, P. R.

Pintrich, M. Zeidner. – San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. – P. 531–566.

9. Sitzmann T., Ely K. A Meta-Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning in Work-Related Training and Educational Attainment:

What We Know and Where We Need to Go // Psychological Bulletin. – 2011. – Vol. 137. – No. 3. – P. 421–442. DOI:

10.1037/a0022777.

10. Vrugt A., Oort F. J. Metacognition, Achievement Goals, Study Strategies and Academic Achievement: Pathways to

Achievement // Metacognition and Learning. – 2008. – Vol. 3. – No. 2. – P. 123–146. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4.

11. Pintrich P. R. A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students //

Educational Psychology Review. – 2004. – Vol. 16. – No. 4. – P. 385–407.

12. Ibraimov, X., & Gaynazarova, G. (2023). The content of preparing students for professional activity in the process of

individual education. Science and Innovation, 2(B12), 330–333.

13. Гайназарова Г. А. Методика организации индивидуального обучения по подготовке студентов к

профессиональной деятельности // Экономика и социум. – 2025. – № 10-1 (137). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/

metodika-organizatsii-individualnogo-obucheniya-po-podgotovke-studentov-k-professionalnoy-deyatelnosti (дата

обращения: 10.08.2026).

14. G. A. Gaynazarova. Individual ta’lim va mustaqil ta’lim konseptsiyalarini integratsiyalashning oliy ta’lim muassasalari

talabalarining kasbiy rivojlanishidagi ahamiyati // Inter Education & Global Study. – 2025. – № 7. https://cyberleninka.

ru/article/n/individual-ta-lim-va-mustaqil-ta-lim-konseptsiyalarini-integratsiyalashning-oliy-ta-lim-muassasalari-talabalarining-

kasbiy (дата обращения: 10.08.2026).

Опубликован

2026-08-12

Как цитировать

Individual ta’lim sharoitida talabalarni kasbiy faoliyatga tayyorlash samaradorligini pedagogik tajriba-sinov va matematik-statistik tahlil asosida baholash. (2026). MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI, 4(8), 100-105. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21962884