Integrativ o‘qitish samaradorligini oshirishning pedagogik shart-sharoitlari mazmuni
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20839556Ключевые слова:
integrativ o‘qitish, pedagogik shart-sharoitlar, fanlararo yondashuv, metakognitsiya, kooperativ ta’lim, formativ baholash, ta’lim samaradorligiАннотация
Ushbu maqolada integrativ o‘qitish samaradorligini oshirishga yo‘naltirilgan pedagogik shart-sharoitlarning
mazmuni va tuzilishi ilmiy jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot integrativ yondashuv asosida tashkil etilgan ta’lim jarayonida
fanlararo bilimlarni sintez qilish, o‘quvchilarning kognitiv faolligini oshirish hamda metakognitiv ko‘nikmalarni rivojlantirish
imkoniyatlarini o‘rganishga qaratilgan. Tajriba-sinov ishlari natijalari integrativ ta’lim modelining akademik ko‘rsatkichlarni
sezilarli darajada yaxshilashini tasdiqlaydi. Maqolada integrativ o‘qitishning asosiy pedagogik shartlari tizimli tavsiflanib,
ularning nazariy va amaliy asoslari xalqaro ilmiy manbalar orqali isbotlanadi
Библиографические ссылки
1. Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. ASCD Publications. Alexandria,
VA. 206 p.
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Ta’lim to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. 2020 yil 23 sentyabr. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonunchilik
palatasi. Toshkent. B. 1–48.
3. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results: The State of Learning and Equity in Education (Volume I). OECD Publishing. Paris.
https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
4. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan. New York. 91 p.
5. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University
Press. Cambridge, MA. 159 p.
6. Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. Basic Books. New York. 300 p.
7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.
Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
8. Vinogradova, N. F. (2013). Integrirovannoe obuchenie v nachal‘noy shkole: teoriya i praktika. Prosveshchenie. Moskva.
192 s.
9. Zverev, I. D., & Maksimova, V. N. (1981). Mezhpredmetnye svyazi v sovremenoy shkole. Pedagogika. Moskva. 160 s.
10. Sayidahmedov, N. S. (2019). O‘zbek maktablarida fanlararo integratsiya: holati va istiqbollari. Xalq ta’limi, 4, 12-19.
11. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). ASCD Publications. Alexandria, VA. 370 p.
12. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman. New York. 336 p.
13. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. ASCD. Alexandria,
VA. 139 p.
14. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. New
York. 392 p.
15. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American
Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
16. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &
Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
17. Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D. J. (2005). Building Academic Vocabulary: Teacher’s Manual. ASCD. Alexandria, VA.
186 p.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
