Contemporary Linguodidactic Trends in Teaching English in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20815071Ключевые слова:
linguodidactics, higher education, English language teaching, communicative approach, TBLT, CLIL, digital education, competency-based approach.Аннотация
This article examines the modern linguodidactic trends in teaching English in higher education institutions
based on a scientific, theoretical, and comparative analysis. The study focuses on the impact of communicative language
teaching, task-based language teaching (TBLT), Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), and digital
learning technologies on the effectiveness of English language instruction. Based on the analysis of scientific literature
and meta-analytical findings, the role of these approaches in developing students’ linguistic, communicative, and academic
competencies is investigated. The study also identifies the ongoing modernization of English language teaching in
higher education and the shift toward a competency-based approach, substantiating its practical significance. The results
demonstrate that the systematic implementation of modern linguodidactic approaches is a crucial factor in enhancing
educational quality and preparing specialists in accordance with international standards
Библиографические ссылки
1. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022, July 6). Decree No. PF–165 “On measures to implement the Strategy
for Innovative Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2022–2026”. Tashkent. https://lex.uz/docs/-6102462
2. D.H.Douglas Brown (2007) “Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy”, Pearson ESL.
569 p. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL9654428M/Teaching_by_Principles
3. David Nunan (2004) “Task-Based Language Teaching”, Cambridge University Press. 222 p.
4. https://books.google.co.uz/books?id=wBKoWKodDk0C&redir_esc=y
5. Jack C. Richards, Theodore S. Rodgers (2022) “Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching” Cambridge University
Press https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532
6. Do Coyle (2010) “CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning”, Cambridge University Press https://www.
researchgate.net/publication/262450443_CLIL_Content_and_Language_Integrated_Learning
7. J. Jalolov (2012) “Chet til o‘qitish metodikasi” (Methodology of Foreign Language Teaching), O`qituvchi. https://scholar.
google.com/scholar?q=Jalolov+Chet+til+o%27qitish+metodikasi
8. Mahkamova. M. (2022) “Interactive teaching methods in English language lessons”, American Journal of Interdisciplinary
Research and Development, 11, 309-314. https://ajird.journalspark.org/index.php/ajird/article/view/439
9. L. Bryfonski (2017) “TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis”, Sage Journals, 23(5). https://doi.
org/10.1177/1362168817744389
10. Abdi Tabari et al. (2025). “Task repetition and L2 oral performance: A meta-analysis. System”, System, 135. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103868
11. Jang Ho Lee et al. (2023). “Effects of EMI-CLIL on secondary-level students’ English learning: A multilevel meta-analysis”,
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38277
12. Hamad H. Alsowat (2020). “Evidence-Based Practices of English Language Teaching: A Meta-Analysis of Meta-Analyses”,
English Language Teaching, 13(11). https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/44029
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
