BARQAROR TRANSPORT TIZIMLARINI LOYIHALASH KOMPETENTLIGINING TUZILMASI: KOMPONENTLAR, MEZONLAR VA INDIKATORLAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20199040Ключевые слова:
barqaror transport, loyihalash kompetentligi, bo‘lajak muhandis, komponent, mezon, indikator, raqamli modellashtirish, ekologik mas’uliyat, muhandislik ta’limiАннотация
Bo‘lajak muhandislarda barqaror transport tizimlarini loyihalash kompetentligining tuzilmasi, tarkibiy komponentlari,
baholash mezonlari va indikatorlari ilmiy-pedagogik jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Zamonaviy muhandislik ta’limida
transport tizimlarini loyihalash jarayoni faqat texnik hisob-kitoblar yoki konstruktiv yechimlarni ishlab chiqish bilan chegaralanmay,
ekologik xavfsizlik, iqtisodiy samaradorlik, raqamli modellashtirish, ijtimoiy qulaylik, energetik tejamkorlik
hamda innovatsion boshqaruv tamoyillarini kompleks hisobga olishni talab etadi. Shu sababli barqaror transport tizimlarini
loyihalash kompetentligini ko‘p komponentli kasbiy-pedagogik hodisa sifatida o‘rganish muhim ahamiyat kasb etadi. Tadqiqotda
mazkur kompetentlikning kognitiv, loyihaviy-amaliy, ekologik-qadriyatli, raqamli-texnologik, kommunikativ-hamkorlik
va refleksiv-baholash komponentlari asoslangan. Har bir komponentga mos mezon va indikatorlar ishlab chiqilib,
ularning diagnostik ahamiyati yoritilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari barqaror transport tizimlarini loyihalash kompetentligini baholashda
faqat nazariy bilim emas, balki real loyiha vaziyatida muammoni aniqlash, modellashtirish, alternativ yechimlarni
solishtirish, ekologik va iqtisodiy jihatdan asoslash, jamoaviy ishlash hamda natijani refleksiv baholash qobiliyatlari muhim
ekanligini ko‘rsatadi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Dewey J. Experience and Education. – New York: Macmillan, 1938. – 116 p.
2. Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. – Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1978. – 159 p.
3. Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. – Englewood Cliffs: Prentice
Hall, 1984. – 256 p.
4. Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. – 4th ed. – Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011.
– 418 p.
5. Felder R. M., Silverman L. K. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education // Engineering Education. –
1988. – Vol. 78, № 7. – P. 674–681.
6. Dym C. L., Agogino A. M., Eris O., Frey D. D., Leifer L. J. Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning //
Journal of Engineering Education. – 2005. – Vol. 94, № 1. – P. 103–120.
7. Crawley E. F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D. R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO
Approach. – 2nd ed. – Cham: Springer, 2014. – 311 p.
8. Prince M. J., Felder R. M. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases
// Journal of Engineering Education. – 2006. – Vol. 95, № 2. – P. 123–138.
9. Mills J. E., Treagust D. F. Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer? // Australasian
Journal of Engineering Education. – 2003. – Vol. 3, № 2. – P. 2–16.
10. Banister D. The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm // Transport Policy. – 2008. – Vol. 15, № 2. – P. 73–80.
11. Black W. R. Sustainable Transportation: Problems and Solutions. – New York: Guilford Press, 2010. – 299 p.
12. Schiller P. L., Bruun E. C., Kenworthy J. R. An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation.
– London: Earthscan, 2010. – 352 p.
13. Litman T. Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. – Victoria: Victoria
Transport Policy Institute, 2023. – 118 p.
14. Зеер Э. Ф. Психология профессионального образования. – Москва: Академия, 2013. – 416 с.
15. Беспалько В. П. Слагаемые педагогической технологии. – Москва: Педагогика, 1989. – 192 с.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
