Conceptual Approaches to Understanding Fanaticism Among Female Adolescents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19536553Ключевые слова:
fanaticism, critical thinking, cognitive rigidity, information filtering, manipulation, cognitive flexibility, female adolescents, educational processАннотация
Based on a systematic review of the literature, the paper examines fanaticism as a result of a cognitive style
formed within the educational process, characterized by deficits in critical thinking and cognitive rigidity. It is demonstrated
that the insufficient development of information filtering and analytical competencies among female adolescents in
modern educational systems increases their vulnerability to destructive ideological manipulation. The study also provides
a scientific justification for the need to reorient educational paradigms toward the development of cognitive flexibility
Библиографические ссылки
1. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber
effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.
org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
2. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American
Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
3. Furnham, A., & Ribchester, T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications.
Current Psychology, 14(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686907
4. Nesi, J. (2020). The impact of social media on youth mental health. North Carolina Medical Journal, 81(2), 116–121.
https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.81.2.116
5. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news and misinformation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
6. Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality
Systems. Basic Books.
7. Zmigrod, L. (2020). The cognitive and biosocial profiles of ideological vulnerability. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
24(5), 336–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
