STEM ta’limi sharoitida o‘quvchilarning texnik tafakkurini rivojlantirishning transdisiplinar metodik modeli
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19320098Ключевые слова:
STEM ta’limi, texnik tafakkur, transdisiplinar yondashuv, metodik model, TPACK, muhandislik tafakkuri, kompyuterli fikrlash, fanlararo integratsiya.Аннотация
Maqolada STEM ta’limi sharoitida o‘quvchilarning texnik tafakkurini rivojlantirishga qaratilgan transdisiplinar
metodik model ishlab chiqilgan. Texnik tafakkur tushunchasi, uning tarkibiy qismlari hamda rivojlanish bosqichlari
tahlil qilingan. Transdisiplinar yondashuvni STEM ta’limi bilan integratsiyalash asosida o‘quvchilarda texnik tafakkurni
shakllantirishning nazariy-metodologik asoslari aniqlangan. TPACK konsepsiyasi va transdisiplinar ta’lim tamoyillariga
asoslangan model besh komponentni o‘z ichiga oladi: motivatsion-maqsadli, mazmuniy, jarayonli-texnologik, nazorat-baholash
va natijaviy. Pedagogik tajriba natijalari model samaradorligini tasdiqlagan. Tavsiyalar umumta’lim maktablari
o‘qituvchilari, metodistlar va tadqiqotchilar uchun mo‘ljallangan
Библиографические ссылки
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi xalq ta’limi tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish
konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi PF-5712-son Farmoni. 2019-yil 29-aprel // Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy
bazasi. https://lex.uz/docs/-4312785
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Raqamli O‘zbekiston - 2030” strategiyasini tasdiqlash va uni samarali amalga
oshirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi PF-6079-son Farmoni. 2020-yil 5-oktyabr // Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy
bazasi. https://lex.uz/docs/-5030957
3. Atoyeva, M.F., & Jo‘raeva, M.T. (2025). Developing technological thinking in school students through interdisciplinary
natural science connections. Analytical Journal of Education and Development, 5(5), 327 - 333.
4. Искакова, А.Б., Қозыбай, А.Қ., & Ериков, Е.С. (2024). Техникалық мамандықтарда іргелі және бейіндеуші
пәндерді оқытуда есептің транспәндік моделін қолдану. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University.
Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociology Series, 148(3), 89 - 107.
5. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary
Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60 - 70.
6. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.
Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017 - 1054.
7. Grover, S., & Pea, R.D. (2013). Computational thinking in K - 12: A review of the state of the field. Educational
Researcher, 42(1), 38 - 43.
8. Wing, J.M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? The Link Magazine, 6, 20 - 23.
9. Kelley, T.R., & Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of
STEM Education, 3(11), 1 - 11.
10. Roehrig, G.H., Dare, E.A., Ellis, J.A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework
of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 1 - 18.
11. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., ... & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated
STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM
Education, 3(1), 2 - 16.
12. Hutchins, N.M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Grover, S., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: A system for synergistic
learning of physics and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83 - 100.
13. Li, Y., & Oon, P.T. (2024). Cultivating computational thinking in STEM education: A systematic review. Educational
Technology & Society, 27(2), 145 - 162.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
