Boshlang‘ich sinf o‘quvchilarida tayanch kompetensiyalarni rivojlantirishda shaxsga yo‘naltirilgan strategiyalar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18613069Ключевые слова:
boshlang‘ich ta’lim, tayanch kompetensiyalar, shaxsga yo‘naltirilgan pedagogika, o‘quvchi faolligi, rivojlantiruvchi baholash, motivatsiya, ta’lim samaradorligiАннотация
Mazkur maqolada boshlang‘ich sinf o‘quvchilarida tayanch kompetensiyalarni rivojlantirishda shaxsga
yo‘naltirilgan pedagogik strategiyalarning samaradorligi tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning asosiy maqsadi shaxsga yo‘naltirilgan
ta’lim yondashuvlarining o‘quvchilarning kognitiv va nokognitiv rivojlanishiga ta’sirini aniqlashdan iborat. Tadqiqot jarayonida
shaxsga yo‘naltirilgan pedagogik strategiyalarni qo‘llashga oid xalqaro va mahalliy ilmiy manbalar tizimli hamda
mazmuniy tahlil asosida o‘rganildi. Tahlil natijalari shuni ko‘rsatdiki, mazkur strategiyalar o‘quvchilarning ta’lim jarayonidagi
faolligini oshirish, mustaqil o‘rganish, hamkorlikda ishlash, kommunikativlik va tanqidiy fikrlash kabi tayanch kompetensiyalarni
rivojlantirishda muhim rol o‘ynaydi. Shuningdek, o‘quvchilarning motivatsiyasi, o‘ziga bo‘lgan ishonchi va
ta’lim jarayonidan qoniqish darajasida ijobiy o‘zgarishlar kuzatilgan. O‘qituvchilar faoliyatida esa ta’lim jarayonini moslashuvchan
tashkil etish hamda rivojlantiruvchi baholashdan foydalanish imkoniyatlarining kengaygani aniqlangan. Maqola
natijalari boshlang‘ich ta’lim amaliyotida shaxsga yo‘naltirilgan pedagogik strategiyalarni samarali joriy etish bo‘yicha
ilmiy-amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqish uchun asos bo‘lib xizmat qiladi
Библиографические ссылки
1. Baturo, A., & Atweh, B. (2007). Teacher beliefs and learner-centred education. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
66(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9033-4
2. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University
Press.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &
Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
4. Bremner, N. (2022). The outcomes of learner-centred pedagogy: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational
Development, 89, 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102541
5. Cheng, Y. C. (2017). New paradigm of learning and teaching. Hong Kong: Springer.
6. Cox, J., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). Learner-centred approaches and student motivation. Educational Psychology, 34(5),
617–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.857010
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
9. Fullan, M. (2014). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
10. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England:
Routledge.
11. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology
Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
12. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory
and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
13. Lattimer, H., & Kelly, K. (2013). Engaging students through inquiry-oriented learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies,
45(4), 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.790480
14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies
(DeSeCo). Paris, France: OECD.
15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Paris, France:
OECD.
16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030.
Paris, France: OECD.
17. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
18. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3),
223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
19. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
20. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
22. UNESCO. (2019). Assessment of transversal competencies: Current tools and practices. Paris, France: UNESCO.
23. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: UNESCO.
24. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
25. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 64–70.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
