Interfaol treninglar orqali o‘qituvchilarning innovatsion fikrlashini rivojlantirish tajribasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18491927Ключевые слова:
interfaol treninglar, innovatsion fikrlash, o‘qituvchilar, kreativlik, pedagogik mahorat, professional rivojlanish, Torrance testiАннотация
Ushbu maqolada interfaol treninglar orqali o‘qituvchilarning innovatsion fikrlash qobiliyatlarini rivojlantirish
masalasi ilmiy jihatdan tadqiq etilgan. Tadqiqot doirasida 180 nafar o‘qituvchi ishtirokida eksperimental ishlar olib
borildi. O‘qituvchilarning innovatsion fikrlash darajasi Torrance Kreativ Fikrlash Testi, Bass–Davis Innovatsion Potensial
Shkalasi hamda maxsus ishlab chiqilgan “Pedagogik kreativlik testi” yordamida aniqlandi. Eksperimental guruh bilan
6 oy davomida interfaol trening dasturi asosida tizimli ish olib borildi. Tadqiqot natijalari interfaol treninglar o‘qituvchilarda
oqim fikrlash (fluency), moslashuvchanlik (flexibility), originallik (originality) va g‘oyalarni takomillashtirish (elaboration)
ko‘rsatkichlarini statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli darajada oshirishini ko‘rsatdi (p < 0,01). Olingan natijalar interfaol treninglarni
o‘qituvchilarning kasbiy malakasini oshirish tizimida samarali pedagogik vosita sifatida qo‘llash mumkinligini tasdiqlaydi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 20-apreldagi PF-60 sonli “2022-2026-yillarda O‘zbekiston Respublikasining
yangi taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risida”gi Farmoni.
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Ta’lim vazirligi. (2023). Statistik yilnoma. Toshkent.
3. Abdullayeva, N. (2021). O‘qituvchilar malakasini oshirishda zamonaviy yondashuvlar. Pedagogika jurnali, 3(45), 12-18.
4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
5. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education
Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy
Institute.
8. De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats. Little, Brown and Company.
9. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and
learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
11. Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2007). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National Board Certification as a
signal of effective teaching. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 134-150.
12. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
13. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,
8(3), 381-391.
14. Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31-57.
15. Karimov, A. (2022). Interfaol metodlar va o‘qituvchilar professional kompetensiyasi. Ta’lim va rivojlanish, 2(34), 45-52.
16. Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. Jossey-Bass.
17. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
18. Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical
model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285-304.
19. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,
74, 5-12.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
