Linguistics in Diplomatic Discourse: The Role of Language in International Relations

Авторы

  • Gulmira Madirimova Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18081260

Ключевые слова:

diplomacy, linguistics, diplomatic discourse, pragmatics, politeness strategies, intercultural communication, ESL/EFL education

Аннотация

Diplomacy relies heavily on language as a strategic tool. Every negotiation, agreement, or official statement
is carefully crafted to persuade, mitigate conflict, and maintain mutual respect between states. This study analyzes diplomatic
discourse from a linguistic perspective, with particular attention to indirectness, politeness strategies, ambiguity,
and intercultural sensitivity. Using a qualitative approach, the research examines authentic diplomatic texts and identifies
practical implications for university-level ESL/EFL education. The findings demonstrate how linguistic strategies shape
international communication and influence diplomatic outcomes

Биография автора

  • Gulmira Madirimova

    Assistant Lecturer
    Renaissance Educational University, Tashkent

Библиографические ссылки

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

2. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

4. Holmes, J. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Longman.

5. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.

6. Kurbatova, T. (2010). Pragmatic Strategies in Diplomatic English. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(2), 489–502.

7. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press.

8. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Mouton de Gruyter.

Опубликован

2025-12-02

Как цитировать

Linguistics in Diplomatic Discourse: The Role of Language in International Relations. (2025). MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18081260