Ichki ishlar organlari xodimlarida kasbiy kompetentlikni oshirish va baholash usullarining xalqaro tahlili..
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17118489Ключевые слова:
ichki ishlar organlari, kasbiy kompetentlik, innovatsion usullar, xorijiy tajriba, baholash tizimiАннотация
Ushbu maqolada ichki ishlar organlari xodimlarining kasbiy kompetentlik darajasini oshirish va baholash
bo‘yicha xalqaro tajriba o‘rganilgan. Olingan natijalar asosida O‘zbekiston Respublikasi ichki ishlar tizimida tatbiq etish
uchun ilmiy-nazariy takliflar ishlab chiqilgan
Библиографические ссылки
1. Ismailov I., Egamberdiev B.I., Komilov M.B. Ichki ishlar organlarida kadrlar bilan ishlashni tashkil etish. Darslik. O‘zbekiston
Respublikasi IIV Akademiyasi, 2019-yil. – 230 b.
2. Khakimova M.F., Mirzaeva M.N., Bazarova U.M., Musakhanova G.M. Opportunities of innovation technologies in higher
education. International Journal on Integrated Education. 3, 12 (Dec. 2020-yil), 282-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31149.
3. Хуторской А.В. Компетентностный подход в обучении. Научно-методическое пособие. А.В. Хуторской. – М.:
Издательство “Эйдос”; Издательство Института образования человека, 2013-yil. – 73 с. ил. (Серия “Новые
стандарты”).
4. Методическое пособие. Камчатский государственный университет им. Витуса Беринга. Россия, 683049, д. 10.
Мир науки, культуры, образования. № 6, 2015-yil.
5. Магомедова Р.М. Дисс. Мир науки, культуры, образования. ИССН 1991-5497. № 3 (76), 2019-yil.
6. Internet: https://www.mcda.us/index.php/prosecutorial-performance-indicators-ppis.
7. Kozyre O.A. (2000). Huquqiy davlatchilik asoslari. – International Journal of Science: № 2, Angliya, – 22-24-bet.
8. Wright R.F. (2008). How prosecutor elections fail us // Ohio St. J. Crim. L. – T. 6. – S. 581.
9. Jiahong H., Ran H. Empirical studies of wrongful convictions in mainland China // U. Cin. L. Rev. – 2011-yil. – T. 80.
– S. 1277-1285.
10. Ma Y.A. (2008). Comparative View of Judicial Supervision of Prosecutorial Discretion // Criminal Law Bulletin-Boston.
– T. 44. – № 1. – S. 30.
11. Garoupa N., Harel A., Hylton K. (2012). The economics of prosecutors // Research Handbook on the Economics of
Criminal Law. – S. 231-242.
12. H.M. Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMcpsi). A Review of the Use of Performance Information in the Crown
Prosecution Service. (2005-yil), pp. 33-42.
13. Xifen Lin, Cheng Chen. (2020). Organizational governance and prosecutorial attitudes: Regulating Chinese prosecutors
through the performance evaluation mechanism // International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. Volume 62,
pp. 145-168.
14. H. Huang, Q. Wang, L. Jiang. (2007). The model of performance management in Harbin Procuratorates // Chinese
Talents. 11, pp. 61-72.
15. Jiang N. (2015). Problems and prospects: China’s response to wrongful convictions // International Journal of Law,
Crime and Justice. – T. 43. – № 1. – S. 109-128.
16. Kinkel J.J., Hurst W.J. (2015). The judicial cadre evaluation system in China: From quantification to intra-state legibility
// The China Quarterly. – T. 224. – S. 933-954.
17. Long Z. (2018). Refining the performance evaluation system in Chinese judiciaries // Tribune of Polit. Sci. Law. 4, pp.
3-15.
18. Japanese National Police Agency. (2021). “Police Officers’ Competency and Evaluation Systems.” NPA Reports.
Tokyo, R. 1-15.
19. Schroeder D. (2012). “Kompetenzorientierte Leistungsbewertung im Polizeidienst.” Deutsches Polizei Institut. Münster,
Heft 3, S. 34-42.
20. United States Department of Justice. (2020). “Law Enforcement Officer Performance Evaluation Systems.” DOJ Publications.
Washington, DC, R. 1-25.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
