UMUMTA’LIM MAKTABLARIDA IQTIDORLI ÖQUVÇILARNI ANIQLAŞ VA ULAR BILAN IŞLAŞ YÖLLARI: JAHON TAJRIBASI TAHLILI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23958679Аннотация
Maqolada umumta’lim maktablarida iqtidorli öquvçilarni aniqlaş va ular bilan işlaşning nazariy asoslari hamda xalqaro tajribasi tahlil qilingan. Renzulli, Gagné, Gardner, Sternberg, Tannenbaum va rus psixologik maktabi vakillarining iqtidor modellari qiyosiy körib çiqilgan; AQŞ, Buyuk Britaniya, Singapur, Janubiy Koreya, Finlyandiya, Isroil, Xitoy, Rossiya va Qozogiston tajribasi umumlaştirilgan. Aniqlaşning köp bosqiçli va köp mezonli tizimi (skrining, çuqur diagnostika, ekspert qarori, individual reja, monitoring) taklif etilgan. Boyitiş, tezlaştiriş va guruhlaş kabi iş şakllarining samaradorligi metatahlillar asosida muhokama qilinib, Özbekiston umumta’lim maktablari şaroitiga moslaştirilgan tört darajali qöllab-quvvatlaş modeli işlab çiqilgan. Kalit sözlar: iqtidor, iste’dod, iqtidorli öquvçilar, aniqlaş (identifikatsiya), boyitiş, akseleratsiya, differensiatsiya, individual ta’lim trayektoriyasi, umumta’lim maktabi.Ключевые слова
iqtidor, iste’dod, iqtidorli öquvçilar, aniqlaş (identifikatsiya), boyitiş, akseleratsiya, differensiatsiya, individual ta’lim trayektoriyasi, umumta’lim maktabiБиблиографические ссылки
1. 1. Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward
2. based on psychological science // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. - 2011. - Vol. 12, No. 1. - P. 3–54.
3. 2. Plucker J.A., Callahan C.M. Research on giftedness and gifted education: Status of the field and considerations for the
4. future // Exceptional Children. - 2014. - Vol. 80, No. 4. - P. 390–406.
5. 3. Özbekiston Respublikasining 2020-yil 23-sentabrdagi ÖRQ-637-sonli1 “Ta’lim töğrisida”gi Qonuni.
6. 4. Sternberg R.J., Davidson J.E. (Eds.). Conceptions of Giftedness. 2nd ed. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
7. 2005.
8. 5. Renzulli J.S. What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition // Phi Delta Kappan. - 1978. - Vol. 60, No. 3. - P.
9. 180–184, 261.
10. 6. Renzulli J.S., Reis S.M. The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A Comprehensive Plan for Educational Excellence. 3rd
11. ed. - Waco: Prufrock Press, 2014.
12. 7. Gagné F. Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory // High Ability Studies. - 2004. - Vol.
13. 15, No. 2. - P. 119–147.
14. 8. Card D., Giuliano L. Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted
15. education // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. - 2016. - Vol. 113, No. 48. - P. 13678–13683.
16. 9. Rogers K.B. Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational
17. practice // Gifted Child Quarterly. - 2007. - Vol. 51, No. 4. - P. 382–396.
18. 10. Steenbergen-Hu S., Makel M.C., Olszewski-Kubilius P. What one hundred years of research says about the effects of
19. ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement // Review of Educational Research. - 2016.
20. - Vol. 86, No. 4. - P. 849–899.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 «Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi» jurnali
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Страницы
Цитирование